What is "fopa"?
Worse, now there is a faction of adult men posing for pictures with young women princesses in FLE that makes my skin crawl. You can easily single out the ones with the ick factor. Poor CMs having to grin and bear it with those type of guests. Thank goodness for handlers to keep the line moving.
They aren't really good for anything,
but they still bring a smile to my face when I push them down a flight of stairs.
Friends are Gods way of apologizing to us for our families.
What is "fopa"?
Oh!! *smacks head*
Well, why do the young boys have to dress up or emulate a monster beast or whacky looking cartoon character. Why not a prince, Charming, Aladdin, anyways the only thing boys will remotely be interested in will be the roller coaster if at all when its done. My son tolerates that new Ariel ride only because it gets us in A/c for a while if its during the heat of the day.
GROSS! shouldn't they put an age limit um okay that's why you wanna keep track of your kids even at WDW.
Many adult men get their pictures taken with all of the characters.
Is there an "ick" factor there as well?
Or do we just arbitrarily assign an ick factor based on how the person looks?
Last edited by i-neighborhood; 05-17-2013 at 11:52 AM.
I'm gonna say Mr. Jeffries would be okay with the adult/character picture taking.
It's a serious question. If you don't have the capacity to answer it, that's fine.
But many adults love getting their picture taken with every character they can. I've personally never cared for it, but know many well-adjusted adults who do.
Should we label them based on our own uninformed opinion of them?
One of our very own posters, though I can't recall who at the moment, had several pictures taken with, IIRC, Ariel last year.
Does that make him "icky"?
There's no need for belittling anyone for bringing some humor to the serious question while at the same time providing a legitimate comparison to certain mindsets when mentioning Abercrombie's chief executive making news for certain opinions.
Perhaps you don't have the capacity to see or understand that correlation and perhaps that's fine too.
To answer your question directly, yeah it might be perceived by some people as strange or maybe they think the "ick" factor is present. People are people and they're going to make snap judgements without full information, doesn't mean they're right, nor does it mean they are wrong; nor does it mean that there is something wrong with the "well adjusted" adult male getting their picture taken with a character, or a young princess in this case, but it doesn't mean there isn't something a little or a lot off with them either.
Last edited by i-neighborhood; 05-17-2013 at 01:52 PM.
If you'd like me to belittle you, I can show you what that actually looks like. Until then, enough of the martyr nonsense.
Either way, I don't see the need to draw the parallels you've drawn. For reasons already given. I'm just hoping you're not falling down that rabbit hole of trying to find things where they don't exist. Or tying to make something bigger out of something minute.
I think the consistent and negative portrayals of the WDW and the entire Disney company from a select few on this board is what runs contrary to what people should expect on this board. People who come to this board do so mainly with the intention of sharing their affinity for WDW with others of a like mind. Not to see their cherished destination constant derided and run down by those who are never happy no matter what they've been given in life.
The ignorance and arrogance displayed by these people is truly disappointing, as is their reaction when they are rebutted in harsher tones than their constitution is equipped to withstand. But, to that I say we employ the time honored saying, "if you can't take the heat, stay out of the kitchen."
I thoroughly enjoy WDW, and have since I first started attending back in the 70's. It truly is "home" to me. And I will indeed react strongly when ignorant, misinformed, incorrect statements are made concerning it.
I stand behind my statements 100%. This means I am fully prepared to accept any consequence/backlash/rebuttal they may cause. I've always though that if you couldn't make that kind of commitment, then you shouldn't make the statement.